The Original DailySkew

Parodies, commentaries, short stories, reviews, opinions ... you never know what you'll read next.

Friday, January 18, 2008

Questioning a commonly-held belief

Occasionally, we question commonly-held beliefs, like the Ebay myth. Well, this time I'd like to question the following typical advice for writers:
"When writing, your text should sound conversational. Read aloud what you write, and toss out anything that doesn't flow. Simplify, for clarity's sake."
This is rubbish, for the following reasons:
  1. Writing should challenge and stimulate the mind. Conversational writing, with it's familiar phrases, just puts the reader to sleep. It's too comforting ... your brain goes on auto-pilot as your eyes soak in the familiar use of words.
  2. Does Shakespeare flow? Seriously -- is that really how people spoke back then? Or did he use English to paint a picture with words, and create quotable and conversational dialog? I wonder if this would have been acceptable to the so-called experts at writer's conventions, who keep their Elements of Style in their back pocket, wary of breaking verbal rules.
  3. Simplifying a sentence may clarify, but it also tends to eliminate poetic turns of phrases. Inexperienced writers are encouraged to avoid such wordy attempts. Isn't this throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Writers should be encouraged to experiment, fail, and try again. It's the only way you GROW as a writer.
  4. In truth, the whole notion of simplifying and eliminating what doesn't flow is a reflection of our dumbed-down society ... and that we seemingly have no time to read.
  5. If every writer strives to write conversationally ... then the variety of written works will diminish.
I'm just sayin'.

***

On a side-note, I highly recommend reading interesting works, as it exercises the mind and breaks the humdrum pattern of our on-the-go-drive-thru-instantaneous existence.

Labels: , , , ,

1 Comments:

Blogger DamianHospital said...

I 100% agree. Real people never spoke like the characters in Shakespeare.

Granted, writers like Mark Twain and Hans Christian Anderson focused on specific dialects, which made their works "realistic".

That being said, the Internet, magazine editors, critics, and self-important convention people love to dish out "advice" from Elements of Style.

Take a look at the big movies that made hundreds of millions of dollars- the Star Wars series and the Spider-Man series, and lecture me about realistic dialog and Elements of Style.

That being said, does this give us a license to create stiff one-dimensional characters, like Neo from the Matrix is accused of being? His creators may be too busy counting all the money he made to answer that question. ;-)

My high school English teacher hated popular books, and refused to read them. She thought every aspiring writer should strive to be classical and perfect. (She was a Type One.) It's like the creative writing authority is an old-school tradition.

Long live Bill James and Alan Moore, who break traditions and challenge "conventional wisdom" every day.

Saturday, January 19, 2008  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home